Emily R’s User Questionnaire

Mucus-Only Method: Creighton Model
👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏽⛪👌🏻

  • Tell us a little about yourself.
    Hey there. I am a lifelong catholic who's been married about 9 months, charting about 15 months. I work as a nurse and am currently working on a graduate degree in nursing education. Love to explore with my husband, whether its hiking and traveling or the new restaurant downtown. And after an engagement and wedding during the height of the pandemic, we are loving married life!
  • What effects has fertility awareness had on your relationship?
    FA has brought to the forefront our sex drive and struggles with intimacy and balancing differing sex drives. It has involved a lot of tears and frustration, more on my part than my husbands; thankfully not with the use of FA but with the abstinance. However I do feel we have become MUCH better communicators regarding intimacy and sex and when we aren't fertile its great;) My husband records my observations daily; I had to push him to record in order to be a piece and help make that call of "is today useable". Prior to him recording I felt very alone and angry with FA, like I had all this pressure but also wanted to just say "forget this". Since we have worked on it together, we feel very much it is a shared, joint effort.
  • How did you find your instructor?
    Found our instructor through a listing in a local church bulletin. The initial consult was free, and actually because we started at the very beginning of quarrantine (April 2020), our instructor offered free follow-ups for 2 months as a "we're all in this together during COVID" (my husband and I are both in healthcare)--our first 5 follow ups were free! Now it is $45/meeting, always accessible by email within about 48 hours, and cost of supplies (we would rather chart in a google doc, but to stay with Creighton practitioner we buy the paper chart also). We have followed the recommended schedule of follow-ups for Creighton and now check in about every 6mths or as needed.
  • Describe your daily charting routine.
    I observe CM all day per Creighton instructions, at bedtime my husband pulls out his phone and charts my observation. When we were engaged, I would text him at night (I was not doing well handling Creighton alone while engaged; finally I sent the chart home with him so he understood the weight of responsibility as well). Initially (the first 8-9 months?) observations and charting were very stressful, I often felt anxious and upset things weren't clear. I got upset that I felt like observing mucus impacted my life (i.e.-couldn't use a bathroom without toilet paper, needed to adjust use of a menstrual cup during period). However now that we are 9 months into marriage, the method is successful, I am seeing the blessings of understanding my cycle with confidence, and that I don't have to mess with temping (yay sleep) or pack a monitor (we travel often!) like other methods. It feels simple, accurate, and natural now and I am truly very happy with this system at this point in our lives.
  • What made you choose this method?
    Long answer-but feels like a piece of my story. I grew up in a catholic home, but in the sense of being very active in the parish and school but no strong prayer or catechesis at home. My mom was clear with me that my parents used a wide variety of contraception over their lives, they strongly encouraged waiting until marriage or "until you're an adult" but that you have to BE CAREFUL women can get pregnant anytime. As I entered adulthood, I was exposed to the medical field that also placed no stock or emphasis on FAMs. My experience with FAM was speeches of NFP from people who touted how close they and their spouse were, how fertility is a beautiful miracle, and they often had 5+ kids. While this is beautiful and wonderful, it felt idyllic to me and I approached NFP with a lot of fear and reservation. I felt that NFP really just meant "have a huge catholic family"--not wrong, but (I thought) without flexibility or nuance that I desired. When I met my husband, I found out he was from one of those beautiful big catholic families with 5 siblings, and parents who taught Couple to Couple League STM. The first time I met his mother, she talked to me about the couples she was mentoring in NFP, how passionate she was, and how so few catholics are "open to life" (in her words, 3+ kids). I respect her passion, but as someone already teetering on the edge of understanding this teaching, I was overwhelmed and she fit every fear I had of an NFP instructor--that I would be taught a method to encourage constant pregnancy and judged for choosing to delay. [Please note, I have no disdain or anything bad to say about CCL, large families, and the huge faith in God my in-laws and many others have; from my background without the strong support and faith this all felt like a huge ask. I knew that if I conceived on our honeymoon, my family would place a lot of judgement on that as well--NOT our reason for delaying pregnancy, but a piece of my experience and hopefully to explain what I meat about fear and reservations]. As my now-husband and I began dating more seriously and considering marriage, I began digging into the Church teachings on marriage and family as well as the science of FAM. I utilized Reddit, facebook groups, blogs, to understand the application and reality. I grew in faith and understanding of the teaching and as we entered engagement I knew my husband and I would not use contraception (which was big for me). I was much less fearful of pregnancy and I knew it was something we desired mutually and felt called to as a couple. However, through prayer and discussion we knew this was the right time for our marriage, but that for a host of reasons, delaying pregnancy was our goal initially. I was very drawn to the science and medicine behind CrMS. It was also the method least based on an algorithm and your past cycles, which felt the most reliable in my mind. We signed up for a free intro course, which took place via Zoom (yay COVID). Our instructor was very enthusistic, knowledgeable, and professional. While faith was acknowledged, the method instructions explained the science which appealed to my nursing background. Immediately it was a good fit. We continued with follow-ups and learning the system. I was most grateful with the questions we were asked about our intention in using the system, our receptiveness to unplanned pregnancy, our satisfaction, and our confidence with the system at every followup. We were never asked why we were choosing to avoid pregnancy, although we have noted our receptiveness to unplanned pregnancy has greatly improved;) Our instructor never offered her experiences as a lesson or guide, rather teaching the use of the system and further resources as needed. My husband and I joked that we didn't even know if she was married, much less had kids, for almost a year--for me, this fit wonderfully and kept from triggering my previous fears and insecurities about our family planning. She was a joyful cheerleader as we became more confident in our abilities to identify fertility and as we have discussed our hopes to soon start a family. I like the standardization and clarity of Creighton-while I've heard some say that mucus signs are unclear, in time they have become mostly simple to me and the "rules" are clearcut. I love that I don't have to worry about my sleep schedule interfering with temps, as a nurse it would be hard. I like not having to rely on technology, during COVID I know testing strips were at a premium or impossible to find. And for 9 months we have sucessfully avoided, and feel fully confident we can continue to avoid as long as needed. I really struggled with the system initially, finding the identification of CM so difficult. My advice is to just chart something, and after a few months it is much more easy to chart accurately. Additionally, we REALLY struggled with implementing the system after we were married. It is highly recommended to use only every other night for 1 month or until you can practice the seminal fluid instructions 3x successfully. I was in tears often that first month, that thinking I had eliminated seminal fluid the night prior, and seeing discharge that required us to wait another 4 nights. But we learned, and now it is much better! And I'm happy we weren't learning in a post-partum phase. We both still struggle somewhat with the fact that pre-peak, we must wait until the end of the day to determine fertility. There's less chance for flirting and building up to intimacy throughout the day, because it could end in disappointment. Or we've already wound down for the evening, and have to decide if we want to try and turn it on because its a useable day. This has improved because we can use any time of day post-peak; but it is still hard to be on the same page about intimacy when 2/3 of the month we don't know until late in the day if its a possibility.

Related Posts

Want To Be Featured As A User On FAbM Base?

Contact us to fill out your user questionnaire!

Scroll to Top

Emoji Key For User Profiles:

Sympto-thermal method🌡

Mucus-only method👌🏻

Sympto-hormonal method📈

Used when Married 👩🏾‍🤝‍👨🏽 

Learned when Engaged 💍

Used when single 🧍‍♀️

Has kid(s) 🚸

Miscarriage 👼🏻

Use a method for health reasons 🥼

Previously used hormonal birth control 💊

Infertility 🌷

Religious ⛪ or Secular ✨

Liability Release: We do not censor our user profiles nor do we fact check them. We believe this is the most effective way to show what happens when science intersects with real life.  This means that some profiles may describe misapplications of method protocols or cases of improper instruction. Consequently, these profiles should never be used to either learn a method or self-diagnose a medical issue. They simply describe an experience that could help guide method choice. While we maintain other areas of our website with information and direction for where to find accurate medical and method-specific information, all questions regarding method protocols or health concerns should be addressed with your instructor and care provider.

Liability Release: We do not censor our user profiles nor do we fact check them. We believe this is the most effective way to show what happens when science intersects with real life.  This means that some profiles may describe misapplications of method protocols or cases of improper instruction. Consequently, these profiles should never be used to either learn a method or self-diagnose a medical issue. They simply describe an experience that could help guide method choice. While we maintain other areas of our website with information and direction for where to find accurate medical and method-specific information, all questions regarding method protocols or health concerns should be addressed with your instructor and care provider.